Objective: To evaluate whether certain patients with early-stage cervical cancer are candidates for less radical surgery when considering fertility-sparing surgery.
Design: Prospective cohort study.
Setting: Two gynecologic cancer centers (St Thomas' Hospital, London; and West Kent Gynaecological Cancer Centre, Maidstone).
Population: Women with early-stage cervical cancer (n = 66) undergoing fertility-sparing surgery, either simple (SVT) or radical vaginal trachelectomy (RVT).
Methods: Prospective clinical data collection and review of patient notes, pathology and radiology data, and pregnancy outcomes.
Main outcome measures: Postoperative complications, surgical specimen histologic analysis, follow-up data, and obstetric outcome.
Results: A total of 66 women underwent either SVT (n = 15) or RVT (n = 51), with pelvic lymphadenectomy, for stage IA2 or IB1 cervical cancer. There was no residual disease in the SVT specimen in 53% versus 29% after RVT. Clear surgical margins in 100% of SVT specimens with residual disease versus 94% after RVT. Two patients had positive lymph nodes after RVT; one of these declined adjuvant treatment until after egg harvesting and subsequently died of disease (1.5%). Median follow-up was 96 months (range, 12-120 months). One patient had a mid vaginal recurrence (1.5%). Twenty-four women have tried to conceive to date, with 14 women having 17 live births. Live birth pregnancy rate was 70.8%.
Conclusions: It is possible to select patients for a less radical fertility-sparing procedure through identification of measurable low-risk factors and thus reduce the morbidity caused by conventional RVT. The selection criteria should be stringent and applied within the setting of a cancer center.