The availability of a gene encoding green fluorescence immediately stimulates interest in the puzzle of autocatalytic formation of the green fluorescent protein (GFP) chromophore. Numerous experimental and theoretical studies have indicated that cyclization is the first and most important step in the maturation process of the GFP. In our previous paper based on cluster models [J. Phys. Chem. B2010, 114, 9698-9705], two possible mechanisms have been investigated with the conclusion that the backbone condensation initiated by deprotonation of the Gly67 amide nitrogen is easier than deprotonation of the Tyr66 α-carbon. However, the impact of the protein environment on the reaction mechanism remains to be explored. In this paper, we investigated the two possible mechanisms with inclusion of protein environmental effects by using molecular dynamics (MD) and combined quantum mechanics/molecular mechanics (QM/MM) calculations. Our calculations reveal no hydrogen bonding network that would facilitate deprotonation of the amide nitrogen of Gly67, although it is the lower energy pathway in the cluster model system. Contrastingly, there is a hydrogen bonding network between Tyr66 α-carbon and Glu222, which is in good agreement with X-ray data. The ONIOM studies show that proton transfer from Tyr66 α-carbon to Glu222 is a long-distance charge transfer process. The charge distribution of the MM region has a significant perturbation to the wave function for the QM region, with the QM energy for the proton transfer product being increased under the influence of the electrostatic protein environment. The barrier for the rate-limiting step in cyclization is quite high, about 40.0 kcal/mol in the case of ONIOM-EE.