Public opinion on media presence in the courthouse

Int J Law Psychiatry. 2012 Jan-Feb;35(1):35-42. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2011.11.003. Epub 2011 Dec 3.

Abstract

Very little attention has been devoted to the public's opinion of media coverage of court cases despite extensive research on pretrial publicity (PTP). Following a provincial judgment to restrict media access in Quebec courthouses, a preliminary unpublished study found that the public was largely in support of these restrictions. The present study sought to expand on this finding in a more widely generalizable sample. Subjects were recruited from continuing education classes and completed a questionnaire that assessed their support for restricting journalists in courthouses. Nearly 80% of the 243 participants supported media restrictions. Although participants in the four experimental conditions and one of the control groups were largely in favor of the restrictions, one control group was opposed to the restrictions. The results suggest that the public prefers that journalists have restricted access to courtroom participants, resonating research on PTP and the Supreme Court's decision on the case.

Publication types

  • Randomized Controlled Trial

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Analysis of Variance
  • Audiovisual Aids
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Journalism* / legislation & jurisprudence
  • Jurisprudence*
  • Male
  • Mass Media* / legislation & jurisprudence
  • Middle Aged
  • Public Opinion*
  • Quebec
  • Students
  • Surveys and Questionnaires
  • Universities
  • Young Adult