Is robotic surgery cost-effective: no

Curr Opin Urol. 2012 Jan;22(1):66-9. doi: 10.1097/MOU.0b013e32834d4d76.

Abstract

Purpose of review: Utilization of robotic surgery has increased dramatically in recent years, but there are significant cost implications to acquisition and utilization of robots. This review will evaluate the cost-effectiveness of using robotics in urologic surgery.

Recent findings: This study will evaluate studies comparing outcomes for open, laparoscopic and robotic procedures as well as costs associated with these procedures.

Summary: Current studies have not found the robotic approaches to be cost-effective. In order for the robot to be cost-effective, there needs to be an improvement in efficacy over alternative approaches and a decrease in costs of the robot or instrumentation.

Publication types

  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Cost-Benefit Analysis
  • Evidence-Based Medicine
  • Hospital Costs*
  • Humans
  • Laparoscopy / adverse effects
  • Laparoscopy / economics*
  • Prostatectomy / economics
  • Robotics / economics*
  • Surgery, Computer-Assisted / adverse effects
  • Surgery, Computer-Assisted / economics*
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Urologic Surgical Procedures / adverse effects
  • Urologic Surgical Procedures / economics*
  • Urologic Surgical Procedures / methods