How much observation is enough? Refining the administration of SOPARC

J Phys Act Health. 2011 Nov;8(8):1117-23. doi: 10.1123/jpah.8.8.1117.

Abstract

Background: The Systematic Observation of Play and Recreation in Communities (SOPARC) was designed to estimate the number and characteristics of people using neighborhood parks by assessing them 4 times/day, 7 days/week. We tested whether this schedule was adequate and determined the minimum number of observations necessary to provide a robust estimate of park user characteristics and their physical activity levels.

Methods: We conducted observations every hour for 14 hours per day during 1 summer and 1 autumn week in 10 urban neighborhood parks: 2 each in Los Angeles, CA; Albuquerque, NM; Columbus, OH; Durham, NC; and Philadelphia, PA. We counted park users by gender, age group, apparent race/ethnicity, and activity level. We used a standardized Cronbach's alpha and intraclass correlation coefficients to test the reliability of using fewer observations.

Results: We observed 76,632 individuals, an average of 547/park/day (range 155-786). Interobserver reliability ranged from 0.80 to 0.99. Obtaining a robust estimate of park user characteristics and their physical activity required a schedule of 4 days/week, 4 times/day.

Conclusion: An abbreviated schedule of SOPARC was sufficient for estimating park use, park user characteristics, and physical activity. Applying these observation methods can augment physical activity surveillance.

Publication types

  • Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural

MeSH terms

  • Age Factors
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Los Angeles
  • Male
  • Motor Activity*
  • New Mexico
  • North Carolina
  • Observation / methods
  • Observer Variation
  • Ohio
  • Philadelphia
  • Play and Playthings
  • Population Surveillance / methods*
  • Public Facilities / statistics & numerical data*
  • Recreation*
  • Sex Factors
  • Socioeconomic Factors
  • Urban Population