Comparison of percutaneous compression plating and short reconstruction nail for treatment of intertrochanteric fracture

Orthop Surg. 2011 Feb;3(1):14-21. doi: 10.1111/j.1757-7861.2010.00117.x.

Abstract

Objective: To compare percutaneous compression plating (PCCP) with Trigen short reconstruction nail (Trigen SRN) for the treatment of intertrochanteric hip fracture.

Methods: Eighty-four patients with intertrochanteric hip fracture admitted to our hospital from January 2007 to June 2008 were included in this retrospective study. Thirty-six patients were treated with PCCP and 48 with Trigen SRN. Information regarding age, surgical time, blood loss, length of follow-up, mortality, fracture impaction, time to union, complications, Harris score and visual analog scale (VAS) were all recorded.

Results: The mean follow-up time was 16.3 ± 3.2 months (13-19 months). The mean time to achieve radiological fracture healing was 3.6 ± 0.8 and 4.1 ± 1.0 months for the PCCP and Trigen SRN groups, respectively (P= 0.020); the mean Harris hip scores were 78.1 ± 4.8 and 74.1 ± 5.2 (P= 0.001); and the mean fracture impaction was 3.6 ± 2.3 and 3.3 ± 2.6 mm (P= 0.023). There were no statistical differences between the two groups in duration of surgery (P= 0.131) and blood loss (P= 0.268). The amount of nail in the inferior-central quadrants was greater in the PCCP group than in the Trigen SRN group.

Conclusion: PCCP achieves earlier pain release and better fracture reduction than Trigen SRN.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Evaluation Study

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Blood Loss, Surgical
  • Bone Nails*
  • Bone Plates*
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Fracture Fixation, Internal / adverse effects
  • Fracture Fixation, Internal / instrumentation*
  • Fracture Fixation, Internal / methods
  • Fracture Healing
  • Hip Fractures / surgery*
  • Humans
  • Middle Aged
  • Postoperative Care / methods
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Treatment Outcome