Total hip arthroplasties in young patients under 50 years: limited evidence for current trends. A descriptive literature review

Hip Int. 2011 Sep-Oct;21(5):518-25. doi: 10.5301/HIP.2011.8641.

Abstract

We examined all reported outcomes of uncemented and cemented total hip arthroplasty in patients younger than 50 years of age listed in Medline (1966- 1 January 2009) and PubMed, and scrutinised reference lists of relevant papers. In addition, we evaluated relevant data in the Swedish hip arthroplasty register. 109 relevant articles were identified, 37 of which had a mean follow-up longer than 10 years. Although uncemented implants are widely used in patients under 50 years of age, there are only 2 reports that fulfil the criteria published by the National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE) in the United Kingdom (follow-up of >10 yrs and survival of =90%). Current trends relating to implant selection remain unsupported by survival data, and additional information about the long-term results of newer implants is essential. As matters stand, the most reliable results relate to cemented implants.

Publication types

  • Meta-Analysis
  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip / methods*
  • Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip / mortality
  • Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip / trends*
  • Cementation
  • Databases, Bibliographic
  • Hip Joint / physiopathology
  • Hip Joint / surgery
  • Hip Prosthesis
  • Humans
  • Middle Aged
  • Pain
  • Postoperative Complications
  • Prosthesis Design
  • Recovery of Function
  • Registries
  • Reoperation
  • Survival Rate
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Young Adult