Comparison of different ovarian cancer detection algorithms

Eur J Gynaecol Oncol. 2011;32(4):408-10.

Abstract

The objective of the study was to evaluate the accuracy of a combined-two step ovarian cancer screening tool consisting of the ovarian cancer symptom index combined with either a risk of ovarian malignancy algorithm (ROMA) or a risk of malignancy index.

Material and methods: The case-control study consisted of 31 patients with ovarian cancer, 30 patients with benign ovarian diseases and 27 age-matched healthy controls.

Results: Sensitivity and specificity of the ovarian cancer symptom index among menopausal women were 84.6% and 52.9%, respectively. ROMA revealed the highest discriminative value when compared to others (AUC 98.4%). When the cutoff level of 28 was applied for menopausal women, ROMA revealed sensitivity and specificity of 95.8% and 93.1%, respectively.

Conclusions: The ovarian cancer symptom index could be used as the first step in ovarian cancer screening with subsequent application of ROMA as a second step screening tool. A larger sample size in both control and patient groups should be evaluated to reach clear conclusions.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Algorithms*
  • Biomarkers, Tumor / analysis
  • CA-125 Antigen / analysis*
  • Case-Control Studies
  • Early Detection of Cancer
  • Epididymal Secretory Proteins / analysis*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Latvia
  • Neoplasm Staging
  • Ovarian Neoplasms / blood
  • Ovarian Neoplasms / diagnosis*
  • Ovarian Neoplasms / pathology
  • Sensitivity and Specificity
  • beta-Defensins

Substances

  • Biomarkers, Tumor
  • CA-125 Antigen
  • DEFB126 protein, human
  • Epididymal Secretory Proteins
  • beta-Defensins