Long-term outcome of percutaneous coronary intervention: the significance of native coronary artery disease progression

Clin Cardiol. 2011 Oct;34(10):588-92. doi: 10.1002/clc.20929. Epub 2011 Sep 19.

Abstract

The extensive use of stents during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is associated with concerns about their potential adverse effects. In-stent restenosis and stent thrombosis definitely significantly affect the PCI outcome. However, review of recent relevant studies suggests that stent-related problems may have been somewhat overestimated when compared to coronary artery disease (CAD) progression at nonstented coronary segments as causative factors of adverse cardiac clinical events late (>30 days) post-PCI. Both stent-related problems and native CAD progression have to be equally addressed to optimize the PCI clinical benefit.

Publication types

  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary* / adverse effects
  • Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary* / instrumentation
  • Coronary Artery Disease / therapy*
  • Coronary Restenosis / etiology
  • Coronary Restenosis / prevention & control
  • Disease Progression
  • Humans
  • Secondary Prevention
  • Stents
  • Thrombosis / etiology
  • Thrombosis / prevention & control
  • Time Factors
  • Treatment Outcome