Radiographic monitoring of incidental abdominal aortic aneurysms: a retrospective population-based cohort study

Open Med. 2011;5(2):e67-76. Epub 2011 Apr 12.

Abstract

Background: An abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) that is identified when the abdomen is imaged for some other reason is known as an incidental AAA. No population-based studies have assessed the management of incidental AAAs. The objective of this study was to measure the completeness of radiographic monitoring of incidental AAAs by means of a population-based analysis.

Methods: We linked a cohort of patients with incidental AAA (defined as a previously unidentified aortic enlargement exceeding 30 mm in diameter found in an imaging study performed for another reason) to various population-based databases. We followed the patients to elective repair or rupture of the aneurysm, death or 31 Mar. 2009. We used evidence-based monitoring guidelines to calculate the proportion of observation time during which each incidental AAA was incompletely monitored. We used negative binomial regression to determine the association of patient-related factors with this outcome.

Results: For the period between January 1996 and September 2008, we identified 191 patients with incidental AAA (mean diameter 37.6 mm, 95% confidence interval [CI] 36.6-38.6 mm; median follow-up 4.4 [range 0.6-12.7] years). Fifty-six of these patients (29.3%) had no radiographic monitoring of the aneurysm. Overall, patients spent one-fifth of their time with incomplete monitoring of the AAA (median 19.4%, interquartile range 0.3%-44.0%). Factors independently associated with incomplete monitoring included older age (relative rate [change in proportion of time with incomplete monitoring] [RR] 1.27, 95% CI 1.10-1.47, per decade), larger size (RR 1.65, 95% CI 1.38-2.01, per 10-mm increase) and detection of the aneurysm while the patient was in hospital or the emergency department (RR 1.34, 95% CI 1.00-1.79). Comorbidities were not associated with monitoring.

Interpretation: Radiographic monitoring of incidental AAAs was incomplete, and almost one-third of patients underwent no monitoring at all. Incomplete monitoring did not appear to be related to patients' comorbidity.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Aorta, Abdominal / diagnostic imaging*
  • Aorta, Abdominal / transplantation
  • Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal* / complications
  • Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal* / diagnosis
  • Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal* / epidemiology
  • Aortic Rupture / epidemiology
  • Aortic Rupture / etiology
  • Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation / methods
  • Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation / statistics & numerical data
  • Canada / epidemiology
  • Cause of Death
  • Confidence Intervals
  • Elective Surgical Procedures / methods
  • Elective Surgical Procedures / statistics & numerical data
  • Female
  • Health Services Needs and Demand
  • Humans
  • Incidental Findings
  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging*
  • Male
  • Monitoring, Physiologic / methods
  • Monitoring, Physiologic / statistics & numerical data
  • Observation / methods
  • Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Risk Assessment
  • Severity of Illness Index
  • Tomography, X-Ray Computed*
  • Ultrasonography*