Comparison of the compression anastomosis ring (EndoCAR) with a circular stapled anastomosis in a porcine model

Surg Innov. 2011 Sep;18(3):235-40. doi: 10.1177/1553350611408388. Epub 2011 Jul 7.

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study was to compare characteristics of rectal compression and stapled anastomoses at multiple time points.

Methods: A total of 50 domestic pigs underwent a rectal anastomosis with a compression device or a circular stapler. They were sacrificed at zero-time, 2 days, 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months. Burst and maximal tolerated pressure and sites of failure, internal diameters, and radiographic leak rates were assessed. Desmosine (elastin) levels were determined.

Results: There were no clinical or radiographic leaks. Overall, 10 out of 27 (37%) compression anastomoses burst at higher pressures than the 14 out of 24 (58%) stapled anastomoses. Mean circumference and anastomotic index were greater for the EndoCAR at 1 week and 3 months. Desmosine levels were similar.

Conclusions: In the porcine model, compression rectal anastomoses with the EndoCAR had improved bursting pressures and internal circumference compared with circular stapled anastomoses.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Anastomosis, Surgical / instrumentation*
  • Animals
  • Chi-Square Distribution
  • Equipment Design
  • Female
  • Materials Testing
  • Models, Animal
  • Pressure
  • Rectum / surgery*
  • Surgical Staplers*
  • Suture Techniques / instrumentation*
  • Swine