Is the spin-orbit coupling important in the prediction of the 51V hyperfine coupling constants of V(IV) O2+ species? ORCA versus Gaussian performance and biological applications

Abstract

Density functional theory calculations of the (51)V hyperfine coupling (HFC) tensor A, have been completed for eighteen V(IV)O(2+) complexes with different donor set, electric charge and coordination geometry. A tensor was calculated with ORCA software with several functionals and basis sets taking into account the spin-orbit coupling contribution. The results were compared with those obtained with Gaussian 03 software using the half-and-half functional BHandHLYP and 6-311g(d,p) basis set. The order of accuracy of the functionals in the prediction of A(iso), A(z) and dipolar term A(z,anis) is BHandHLYP > PBE0 >> B3PW > TPSSh >> B3LYP >> BP86 > VWN5 (for A(iso)), BHandHLYP > PBE0 >> B3PW > TPSSh > B3LYP >> BP86 > VWN5 (for A(z)), B3LYP > PBE0 ∼ B3PW ∼ BHandHLYP >> TPSSh > BP86 ∼ VWN5 (for A(z,anis)). The good agreement in the prediction of A(z) with BHandHLYP is due to a compensation between the overestimation of A(iso) and underestimation of A(z,anis) (A(z) = A(iso) + A(z,anis)), whereas among the hybrid functionals PBE0 performs better than the other ones. BHandHLYP functional and Gaussian software are recommended when the V(IV)O(2+) species contains only V-O and/or V-N bonds, whereas PBE0 functional and ORCA software for V(IV)O(2+) complexes with one or more V-S bonds. Finally, the application of these methods to the coordination environment of V(IV)O(2+) ion in V-proteins, like vanadyl-substituted insulin, carbonic anhydrase, collagen and S-adenosylmethionine synthetase, was discussed.