The submucosal cushion does not improve the histologic evaluation of adenomatous colon polyps resected by snare polypectomy

Abstract

Background & aims: Although the "submucosal cushion" technique or injection-assisted polypectomy (IAP) is often used to resect colon polyps, little is known on the influence of this technique on histologic interpretation. We aimed to evaluate whether the use of a submucosal cushion improves the histologic and margin evaluation of colon polyps.

Methods: Consecutive patients undergoing polypectomy with and without IAP were included. An experienced blinded gastrointestinal pathologist evaluated the specimens using standardized criteria.

Results: One hundred eleven sessile colon adenomas were analyzed (IAP, n = 65, standard, n = 46). Two-thirds of polyps ranged in size from 10 to 20 mm; the average polyp size was 13.2 mm for IAP and 9.9 mm for standard snare polypectomy (P = .001). The cautery degree, cautery amount, and margin evaluability, did not differ substantially with regard to the resection technique. For polyps ≥10-20 mm, the overall architecture quality was better in polyps resected with standard technique as compared with IAP.

Conclusions: The utilization of IAP did not result in a better margin evaluability of the resected polyp. Overall, IAP does not result in a better histologic polyp evaluability.