Influence of injection conditions on EDDS-flushing of metal-contaminated soil

J Hazard Mater. 2011 Aug 30;192(2):667-75. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.05.067. Epub 2011 May 27.

Abstract

This study evaluated the design of step-gradient, single-pulse, multi-pulse, and continuous injection of biodegradable EDDS ([S,S]-ethylene-diamine-disuccinic acid, under the same total dosage) and the significance of pore-water velocities during in situ soil flushing. In view of the metal breakthrough and extraction efficiency of each injection mode, single-pulse injection was found to be the least effective for all metals. Multi-pulse injection was consistently more effective than single-pulse injection, although the efficiency of second and third pulse injections significantly diminished. Continuous injection offered a simple operation and the greatest Ni and Cu extraction, whereas step-gradient injection was the best option for Zn and Pb extraction because it mitigated the influence of metal exchange. Moreover, a rinsing step with a background solution following the initial injection of the multi-pulse injection removed newly formed metal-EDDS complexes from soil pores effectively before further EDDS-flushing. A decrease in pore-water velocity provided a longer residence time for greater Ni and Cu extraction, but also enhanced the rate-limited metal exchange of Zn-EDDS and Pb-EDDS complexes and thus hindered Zn and Pb extraction. These results suggest a slower and continuous injection for the best Ni or Cu removal, but a faster and step-gradient injection for Zn or Pb removal.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Ethylenediamines / chemistry*
  • Metals / chemistry*
  • Soil Pollutants / chemistry*
  • Succinates / chemistry*

Substances

  • Ethylenediamines
  • Metals
  • Soil Pollutants
  • Succinates
  • N,N'-ethylenediamine disuccinic acid