Custom endoprosthetic reconstruction for malignant bone disease in the humeral diaphysis

Acta Orthop Belg. 2011 Apr;77(2):171-9.

Abstract

The optimal reconstructive method following segmental resection of malignant tumours in the humeral diaphysis is unknown as there are no prospective long-term studies comparing biologic with endoprosthetic reconstruction. This is a retrospective review of 13 patients who, between 1995 and 2010, had undergone limb salvage at our institution using a custom-made humeral diaphyseal endoprosthetic replacement following excision of malignant bone disease. There were 9 males and 4 females with a mean age of 35 years at the time of surgery (range: 10 to 78). Mean follow-up was 56.8 months (range: 5 to 148). Cumulative patient survival was 75% at 10 years. Implant survival, with removal of the endoprosthesis or part of it for any reason as an end point, was 47% at 10 years. Seven patients required revision (54%). Complications included metastases in four, aseptic loosening in four, peri-prosthetic fracture in two and local recurrence in two. Mean MSTS and TESS scores were 23 (18 to 27) and 67% (52-80) respectively. Custom-made humeral diaphyseal replacement following resection of malignant bone tumours provided functional results superior to amputation, without an obvious compromise in patient survival. There was a relatively high revision rate for aseptic loosening and peri-prosthetic fracture and patients should be counselled about this preoperatively.

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Bone Neoplasms / diagnostic imaging
  • Bone Neoplasms / surgery*
  • Child
  • Chondrosarcoma / surgery
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Humerus* / surgery
  • Limb Salvage / methods
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Osteosarcoma / surgery
  • Prostheses and Implants*
  • Prosthesis Design
  • Prosthesis Failure
  • Prosthesis Implantation
  • Radiography
  • Reoperation
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Sarcoma / surgery*
  • Sarcoma, Ewing / surgery
  • Young Adult