Interface micromotions increase with less-conforming cementless glenoid components

J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2012 Apr;21(4):474-82. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2011.03.008. Epub 2011 Jun 8.

Abstract

Background: The optimal degree of conformity between the glenoid and humeral components in total shoulder arthroplasty for best performance and durability is still a matter of debate. The main aim of this study is to evaluate the influence of joint conformity on the bone-implant interface micromotions in a cementless glenoid implant.

Materials and methods: Polyethylene inlays with different degrees of conformity (radial mismatch of 0, 2, 4, and 6 mm) were mounted on a cementless metal back and then implanted in a bone substitute. These glenoid components were loaded by a prosthetic humeral head during a force-controlled experiment. Normal-to-interface micromotions and bone substitute deformations were measured at different points of the interface. Rim displacement and humeral head translation were also measured. A finite element (FE) model of the experiments was implemented to estimate the normal- and tangent-to-interface micromotions in the entire bone-implant interface.

Results: All measured variables increased with less-conforming PE inlays. Normal-to-interface micromotions were significantly larger (P < .05) when the radial mismatch was 6 mm compared with the fully conforming inlay. The FE model was in agreement and complemented the experimental results. FE model-predicted interface micromotions were already significantly larger when the radial mismatch was equal to 4 mm.

Discussion: In a force-controlled experiment with a cementless glenoid component, a non-conforming PE inlay allows larger interface micromotions than a conforming inlay, reaching a magnitude that may hamper local bone ingrowth in this type of component. This is mainly because of the larger humeral head translation that boosts the effects of the so-called rocking-horse phenomenon.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Arthroplasty, Replacement*
  • Finite Element Analysis
  • Humans
  • Joint Prosthesis*
  • Models, Biological
  • Motion
  • Prosthesis Design
  • Shoulder Joint / surgery*
  • Stress, Mechanical