Comparison of 7 staging systems in north Indian cohort of hepatocellular carcinoma

Trop Gastroenterol. 2010 Oct-Dec;31(4):271-8.

Abstract

Background & aim: Many liver staging systems have been proposed for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC); however it is still controversial which staging system is best. The aim of this study was to compare the ability of 7 different staging systems in predicting survival in an Indian cohort of patients with HCC.

Methods: In this prospective study, 101 HCC patients were diagnosed and stratified according to 7 different staging systems; along with analysis of independent predictors of survival and their correlation with it (Kaplan-Meier analysis).

Results: CLIP, Tokyo score and BCLC staging system showed a significant difference in the probability of survival. All other staging systems failed to show a significant difference in survival. Age, portal vein thrombosis, serum bilirubin, MELD score showed a significant difference with survival in univariate analysis. However, serum bilirubin was the independent predictor of survival with a hazard ratio of 1.609 (95% CI 1.015-2.553, p = 0.043).

Conclusion: The CLIP, Tokyo score and BCLC are the most useful staging systems in an Indian cohort.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Carcinoma, Hepatocellular / mortality
  • Carcinoma, Hepatocellular / pathology*
  • Cohort Studies
  • End Stage Liver Disease / mortality
  • End Stage Liver Disease / pathology
  • Female
  • Humans
  • India / epidemiology
  • Liver Neoplasms / mortality
  • Liver Neoplasms / pathology*
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Neoplasm Staging / methods*
  • Neoplasm Staging / mortality
  • Survival Analysis