Cavo-tricuspid isthmus radiofrequency (RF) ablation is an efficient option in the treatment of atrial flutter. In the case of a well-tolerated, first episode of atrial flutter, it has a class II indication, level of evidence B, the current first-line therapeutic option being electrical cardioversion, pharmacological cardioversion or atrial overdrive pacing followed by long-term antiarrhythmic therapy. The purpose of this study was to evaluate, in a prospective manner, the recurrence rate of these two different therapeutic options after the treatment of a first episode of atrial flutter.
Material and methods: Between January 2007 and May 2009, for 99 patients admitted to the hospital for a first episode of atrial flutter, cardioversion was attempted either by RF ablation (group 1-42 patients), or by electrical cardioversion, pharmacological cardioversion or atrial overdrive pacing followed by long-term Amiodarone therapy (group 21-57 patients). We compared the recurrence rate of atrial flutter in the 2 groups after a follow-up period of one year.
Results: In group 1, sinus rhythm was achieved in all patients, with bidirectional isthmic block being obtained for 37 patients (88.1%). In group 2, conversion to sinus rhythm was obtained in all cases. The recurrence rate was 6 times higher in group 2 vs group 1 (57.9% = 33 patients vs 9.5% = 4 patients) (p = 0.01).
Conclusion: RF ablation should be considered as a therapeutic option in the treatment of the first episode of atrial flutter, due to its significant efficiency in maintaining sinus rhythm and to its low recurrence rate.