Evaluation of a clinical scoring system and directed laboratory testing for respiratory virus infection in hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients

Transpl Infect Dis. 2011 Oct;13(5):448-55. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3062.2011.00631.x. Epub 2011 Apr 18.

Abstract

A simple clinical screening (CS) tool for respiratory virus (RV) infection was introduced and evaluated in a single hematology ward, as part of a strategy to reduce nosocomial RV infection. Up to 6 clinical symptoms or signs were scored and a predefined threshold score of ≥ 2 prompted paired nose/throat swab (NTS) collection for RV testing. The criterion standard for RV infection was positive immunofluorescence (IF) or polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for 7 and 15 viruses, respectively. The tool was shown to be most beneficial at excluding infection at a threshold score of 1 (negative predictive value [NPV] 89%, [95% confidence interval 78-96%], sensitivity 85% [70-94%], specificity 35% [27-43%]), compared with a score of 2 (NPV 85% [76-91%], sensitivity 63% [46-77%], specificity 57% [48-65%]) at a prevalence of 22%. The tool's ability to diagnose infection was limited (positive predictive value 27% and 29% at thresholds 1 and 2). The sensitivity of IF compared with PCR was 45% for the 7 viruses common to both, and 23% for the extended virus panel detected by PCR. An algorithm incorporating CS, paired NTS collection at a threshold of 1 symptom or sign, and sensitive testing including PCR can guide infection control measures in hospitalized hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients.

Publication types

  • Evaluation Study
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Fluorescent Antibody Technique
  • Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation / adverse effects*
  • Humans
  • Nasal Cavity / virology
  • Polymerase Chain Reaction / methods
  • Respiratory Tract Infections / diagnosis*
  • Respiratory Tract Infections / virology*
  • Sensitivity and Specificity
  • Virus Cultivation / methods