Statins and prostate cancer diagnosis and grade in a veterans population

J Natl Cancer Inst. 2011 Jun 8;103(11):885-92. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djr108. Epub 2011 Apr 15.

Abstract

Background: Although prostate cancer is commonly diagnosed, few risk factors for high-grade prostate cancer are known and few prevention strategies exist. Statins have been proposed as a possible treatment to prevent prostate cancer.

Methods: Using electronic and administrative files from the Veterans Affairs New England Healthcare System, we identified 55,875 men taking either a statin or antihypertensive medication. We used age- and multivariable-adjusted Cox proportional hazard models to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for prostate cancer incidence among patients taking statins (n = 41,078) compared with patients taking antihypertensive medications (n = 14,797). We performed similar analyses for all lipid parameters including total cholesterol examining each lipid parameter as a continuous variable and by quartiles. All statistical tests were two-sided.

Results: Compared with men taking an antihypertensive medication, statin users were 31% less likely (HR = 0.69, 95% CI = 0.52 to 0.90) to be diagnosed with prostate cancer. Furthermore, statin users were 14% less likely (HR = 0.86, 95% CI = 0.62 to 1.20) to be diagnosed with low-grade prostate cancer and 60% less likely (HR = 0.40, 95% CI = 0.24 to 0.65) to be diagnosed with high-grade prostate cancer compared with antihypertensive medication users. Increased levels of total cholesterol were also associated with both total (HR = 1.02, 95% CI = 1.00 to 1.05) and high-grade (HR = 1.06, 95% CI = 1.02 to 1.10) prostate cancer incidence but not with low-grade prostate cancer incidence (HR = 1.01, 95% CI = 0.98 to 1.04).

Conclusions: Statin use is associated with statistically significantly reduced risk for total and high-grade prostate cancer, and increased levels of serum cholesterol are associated with higher risk for total and high-grade prostate cancer. These findings indicate that clinical trials of statins for prostate cancer prevention are warranted.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Anticarcinogenic Agents / administration & dosage*
  • Anticholesteremic Agents / administration & dosage
  • Antihypertensive Agents / administration & dosage
  • Atorvastatin
  • Biomarkers, Tumor / blood*
  • Cholesterol / blood*
  • Confounding Factors, Epidemiologic
  • Fatty Acids, Monounsaturated / administration & dosage
  • Fluvastatin
  • Heptanoic Acids / administration & dosage
  • Humans
  • Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors / administration & dosage*
  • Incidence
  • Indoles / administration & dosage
  • Lipids / blood
  • Lovastatin / administration & dosage
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Multivariate Analysis
  • New England / epidemiology
  • Pravastatin / administration & dosage
  • Proportional Hazards Models
  • Prostatic Neoplasms / epidemiology*
  • Prostatic Neoplasms / pathology*
  • Prostatic Neoplasms / prevention & control
  • Pyrroles / administration & dosage
  • Risk Assessment
  • Severity of Illness Index
  • Simvastatin / administration & dosage
  • Veterans / statistics & numerical data*

Substances

  • Anticarcinogenic Agents
  • Anticholesteremic Agents
  • Antihypertensive Agents
  • Biomarkers, Tumor
  • Fatty Acids, Monounsaturated
  • Heptanoic Acids
  • Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors
  • Indoles
  • Lipids
  • Pyrroles
  • Fluvastatin
  • Cholesterol
  • Lovastatin
  • Atorvastatin
  • Simvastatin
  • Pravastatin