Repeat six-minute walk tests in patients with chronic heart failure: are they clinically necessary?

Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2011 Aug;18(4):601-6. doi: 10.1177/1741826710389403. Epub 2011 Jan 31.

Abstract

Background: Owing to a reported learning effect in patients with chronic cardiopulmonary disease, performance of at least two six-minute walk tests (6MWT) are recommended as standard practice. Patients with chronic heart failure (CHF) are typically elderly and frail and it is unknown whether current guidelines are practical in a clinical setting.

Aims: The aim of this study was to determine whether repeat performance of 6MWTs in patients with CHF is related to between-test interval or baseline performance.

Methods: This was a multisite observational study enrolling participants entering into heart failure rehabilitation programmes. Participants performed two 6MWTs with randomly allocated inter-test intervals between 15 and 90 minutes. Distance walked in the second test was compared with the first test using a paired t test.

Results: Eighty-eight participants (45 females, age 65 ± 14 years) with stable CHF were enrolled. Mean distance walked increased from 301 metres in test 1 to 313 metres in test 2 (p < 0.001). No significant change was recorded between test 1 and test 2 for those whose baseline distance was <300 metres. The interval between tests had no significant effect on the distance walked.

Conclusion: The change in 6MWT distance was significantly associated with better baseline performance but not with the interval between tests.

Publication types

  • Multicenter Study
  • Randomized Controlled Trial

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Chronic Disease
  • Exercise Test*
  • Female
  • Heart Failure / diagnosis*
  • Heart Failure / physiopathology
  • Heart Failure / rehabilitation
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Predictive Value of Tests
  • Prognosis
  • Queensland
  • Time Factors
  • Unnecessary Procedures
  • Walking*