Pamidronate versus observation in asymptomatic myeloma: final results with long-term follow-up of a randomized study

Leuk Lymphoma. 2011 May;52(5):771-5. doi: 10.3109/10428194.2011.553000. Epub 2011 Feb 8.

Abstract

A prospective, multicenter, randomized trial comparing pamidronate administration (60-90 mg once a month for 1 year) versus simple observation in 177 patients with asymptomatic myeloma was performed to explore whether the administration of this drug reduces the rate of and/or the time to progression to overt, symptomatic disease. No relevant side effects were recorded in pamidronate-treated patients. With a minimum follow-up of 5 years for live patients, there were 56/89 (62.9%) progressions in the pamidronate-treated group and 55/88 (62.5%) within the controls (p = NS). Median time to progression was 46 and 48 months, respectively (p = NS). Overall survival was also similar between the two groups. Skeletal-related events at the time of progression were observed in 40/55 (72.7%) controls, but only in 22/56 (39.2%) pamidronate-treated patients (p = 0.009). In conclusion, the administration of pamidronate in asymptomatic myeloma, while reducing bone involvement at progression, did not decrease the risk of transformation and the time to progression into overt myeloma.

Publication types

  • Clinical Trial, Phase III
  • Multicenter Study
  • Randomized Controlled Trial

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Bone Density Conservation Agents
  • Bone Diseases / drug therapy
  • Bone Diseases / prevention & control
  • Diphosphonates / administration & dosage*
  • Diphosphonates / therapeutic use
  • Disease Progression
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Humans
  • Middle Aged
  • Multiple Myeloma / drug therapy*
  • Multiple Myeloma / mortality
  • Multiple Myeloma / pathology
  • Pamidronate
  • Survival Analysis
  • Young Adult

Substances

  • Bone Density Conservation Agents
  • Diphosphonates
  • Pamidronate