[Transanal endoscopic surgery with conventional laparoscopy materials: is it feasible?]

Cir Esp. 2011 Feb;89(2):101-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ciresp.2010.11.002. Epub 2011 Jan 20.
[Article in Spanish]

Abstract

Introduction: Transanal endoscopic surgery with conventional laparotomy materials may be an alternative to transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) for the excision of rectal lesions susceptible to local resection.

Material and method: We prospectively analysed 27 patients included consecutively between 1999 and 2009, on whom a Transanal endoscopic operation (TEO) was performed by total resection of the rectal wall. All procedures were performed with a 40mm rectoscope, initially designed by us and later with the Storz rectoscope, using conventional laparoscopic tools and material.

Results: We operated on 27 patients with a mean age of 69.4 years: 23 due to benign lesions and 4 malignant. The medium distance of the tumour to the anal margins was 8.2cm (range 5-15) and a mean tumour diameter of 3.38 ± 1.2cm. There were 4 postoperative complications, 3 due to bleeding and one case of perforation. The mean hospital stay was 6 ± 3.75 days. There was no perioperative mortality or recurrences..

Conclusion: Performing transanal endoscopic surgery with conventional laparoscopy material is feasible, with a reduction in costs and accessible to laparoscopy surgeons.

Publication types

  • English Abstract

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Feasibility Studies
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Laparoscopes*
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Proctoscopy / instrumentation*
  • Prospective Studies
  • Rectal Neoplasms / surgery*