Protective effect of NaF/triclosan/copolymer and MFP dentifrice on enamel erosion

Am J Dent. 2010 Aug;23(4):193-5.

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate in situ the protective effect of sodium fluoride (NaF)/triclosan/copolymer dentifrice compared with monofluorphosphate (MFP) dentifrice on eroded enamel.

Methods: The specimens were subjected to erosion with cola soft drink for 60 seconds, four times a day, for 5 days, followed by treatment with the slurry of nonfluoridated, NaF (1450 ppm F/triclosan/copolymer) or MFP (1450 ppm F) dentifrices. Their effects were assessed by surface hardness loss.

Results: The dentifrice containing NaF/triclosan/copolymer was statistically more effective on reduction of enamel acid erosion than the non-fluoride and the MFP dentifrice (P < 0.05).

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Randomized Controlled Trial
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Anti-Infective Agents, Local / therapeutic use*
  • Carbonated Beverages / adverse effects
  • Cross-Over Studies
  • Dental Enamel / drug effects*
  • Dentifrices / therapeutic use*
  • Female
  • Fluorides / therapeutic use*
  • Hardness
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Phosphates / therapeutic use*
  • Polymers
  • Protective Agents / therapeutic use*
  • Single-Blind Method
  • Sodium Fluoride / therapeutic use*
  • Time Factors
  • Tooth Erosion / prevention & control*
  • Triclosan / therapeutic use*
  • Young Adult

Substances

  • Anti-Infective Agents, Local
  • Dentifrices
  • Phosphates
  • Polymers
  • Protective Agents
  • fluorophosphate
  • Triclosan
  • Sodium Fluoride
  • Fluorides