Risk factors for surgical failure after posterior intravaginal slingplasty: a case series

Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2011 Mar;155(1):106-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2010.12.005. Epub 2011 Jan 5.

Abstract

Objective: The goal of this study was to analyze the potential risk factors of surgical failure after posterior intravaginal slingplasty for uterine or vaginal vault prolapse.

Study design: Women with symptomatic uterine or vaginal vault prolapse that extended to or beyond the introitus were eligible for inclusion. Each woman underwent a detailed history taking and a vaginal examination for staging of pelvic organ prolapse before treatment. Follow-up evaluations were at 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, 24, and 30 months after the operation. Surgical failure is defined as the presence of symptomatic uterine or vaginal vault prolapse ≧stage 2 (higher than 0, at the hymen) after posterior intravaginal slingplasty.

Results: The surgical failure rate (8/61) following posterior intravaginal slingplasty was 13.1%. Using univariable logistic regression, C or D point stage IV before surgery was significantly associated with surgical failure of posterior intravaginal slingplasty for uterine or vaginal vault prolapse. Complications (11/61=18%) included vaginal erosion (9.8%), blood loss over 500 ml (4.9%), and perineal pain (3.3%).

Conclusion: Procidentia is a significant risk factor for surgical failure of posterior intravaginal slingplasty, and therefore this procedure should never be used alone in patients with complete uterine or vaginal vault prolapse.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Middle Aged
  • Pelvic Organ Prolapse / surgery*
  • Postoperative Complications / epidemiology
  • Risk Factors
  • Severity of Illness Index
  • Treatment Failure
  • Uterine Inversion / epidemiology
  • Uterine Prolapse / surgery*