Modelling the budget impact of darunavir in the treatment of highly treatment-experienced, HIV-infected adults in France

Pharmacoeconomics. 2010:28 Suppl 1:183-97. doi: 10.2165/11587520-000000000-00000.

Abstract

Background: A key element for payers in the assessment of the economic profile of a medication is its anticipated impact on the evolution of healthcare budgets.

Objectives: To forecast the impact of the use of darunavir with low-dose ritonavir 600/100 mg twice a day (bid) in highly treatment-experienced, HIV-infected adults who have failed one or more protease inhibitor (PI)-containing regimen on the budget of the French Sickness Fund (French healthcare system) over a 3-year time horizon.

Methods: A transition state model based on disease severity was developed that compared the evolution of antiretroviral and non-antiretroviral-related direct costs of care in the target population over 3 years (2007-2009) under two scenarios: (1) darunavir enters the French market in year 1; (2) darunavir is not available to the target population during 2007-2009. Model inputs were derived from a targeted analysis of the French hospital database in HIV, the darunavir POWER 1 and 2 trials and other relevant clinical studies.

Results: In the scenario where darunavir was available from year 1, the proportion of patients in the lower, more costly CD4 cell count strata (≤ 100 cells per mm³) was consistently lower than in the scenario without darunavir in each year of the model (17.0% vs 19.2%, 13.9% vs 18.3% and 10.8% vs 16.8% for years 1, 2 and 3, respectively). As a result, over the entire 3-year period, the net increase of antiretroviral drug costs (+ 5.6 million Euros; €), resulting from the substitution of older, cheaper PIs by darunavir, is expected to be fully compensated by savings in hospitalization costs (€-9.7 million) and expenditures for other HIV-related (non-antiretroviral) medications (€-7.3 million), leading to a net saving of €11.4 million or 2.9% of the total budget in the scenario without darunavir. Various sensitivity analyses confirmed these projected savings.

Conclusion: The use of darunavir/ritonavir (DRV/r) 600/100 mg bid, in combination with other antiretroviral agents, in highly pre-treated, HIV-infected adults who have failed one or more PI-containing highly active antiretroviral therapy regimen is not expected to increase the budget of the French healthcare system, in comparison with a scenario without darunavir. Further research is needed to estimate the budget impact of the use of DRV/r in less treatment-experienced, HIV-infected individuals in France.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Antiretroviral Therapy, Highly Active / economics*
  • Budgets*
  • CD4 Lymphocyte Count / economics
  • Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic
  • Darunavir
  • Drug Costs
  • Drug Resistance
  • France
  • HIV / drug effects
  • HIV Infections / drug therapy
  • HIV Infections / economics*
  • HIV Infections / virology
  • HIV Protease Inhibitors / economics*
  • HIV Protease Inhibitors / therapeutic use
  • Health Care Costs
  • Humans
  • Models, Statistical*
  • Multicenter Studies as Topic
  • RNA, Viral / economics
  • Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
  • Sulfonamides / economics*
  • Sulfonamides / therapeutic use
  • Treatment Failure
  • Viral Load / economics

Substances

  • HIV Protease Inhibitors
  • RNA, Viral
  • Sulfonamides
  • Darunavir