Clinical guidelines and practice: a commentary on the complexity of tinnitus management

Eval Health Prof. 2011 Dec;34(4):413-20. doi: 10.1177/0163278710390355. Epub 2010 Dec 21.

Abstract

Subjective tinnitus is an enigmatic and chronic condition that is predominantly managed as symptomatic. Little high-level evidence exists for the efficacy and specificity of the various tinnitus management strategies currently used, and this is reflected in documents that aim to guide clinicians. As a consequence, there are clear gaps in evidence-based practice linking diagnosis to the most effective management strategies as well as a general lack of consensus about which are appropriate strategies for assessment and management. Several guidelines have been produced from research efforts and from expert opinion. All recommend standardization of assessment and a range of management options but do not yet provide a means to link the two. The authors call for clinicians, scientists, and policy makers to work together to address this barrier to good practice.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Audiology / methods
  • Cognitive Behavioral Therapy
  • Drug Therapy
  • Evidence-Based Practice / standards*
  • Health Care Surveys
  • Hearing Aids
  • Humans
  • Music Therapy
  • Patient-Centered Care / methods*
  • Practice Guidelines as Topic*
  • Relaxation Therapy
  • Tinnitus / complications
  • Tinnitus / diagnosis
  • Tinnitus / therapy*
  • United Kingdom
  • Workforce