Comparison of quality of life between voice rehabilitated and nonrehabilitated laryngectomies in a developing world community

Acta Otolaryngol. 2011 Mar;131(3):310-5. doi: 10.3109/00016489.2010.526960. Epub 2010 Dec 10.

Abstract

Conclusions: Quality of life (QOL) scores were significantly higher among voice rehabilitated patients although this was accompanied by significant immediate and long-term morbidity and a cost implication for the patient.

Objective: We present a prospective and cross-over study of overall QOL and morbidity related to voice restoration in laryngectomees.

Methods: The EORTC QOL questionnaire (QLQ-C30 and QLQ-H&N-35) was distributed among all the consenting patients alive after laryngectomy from January 2008 to October 2009. In patients who had secondary voice rehabilitation, post-rehabilitation QOL scores were collected separately. Comparison of QOL between the non-rehabilitated and rehabilitated cohorts was done and a cross-over study of pre-rehabilitation and post-rehabilitation scores were done in the second cohort.

Results: A total of 113 patients were studied. QOL scores were significantly higher among voice rehabilitated patients.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Cohort Studies
  • Cross-Over Studies
  • Developing Countries
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Humans
  • Laryngeal Neoplasms / surgery*
  • Laryngectomy / methods*
  • Prospective Studies
  • Quality of Life / psychology*
  • Surgical Flaps
  • Surveys and Questionnaires
  • Voice Disorders / economics
  • Voice Disorders / psychology
  • Voice Disorders / rehabilitation*