Alberta's and Ontario's liquor boards: why such divergent outcomes?

Can Public Adm. 2010;53(4):509-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1754-7121.2010.00147.x.

Abstract

The provinces of Alberta and Ontario have chosen very different methods to distribute alcoholic beverages: Alberta privatized the Alberta Liquor Control Board (ALCB) in 1993 and established a private market to sell beverage alcohol, while Ontario, in stark contrast, opted to retain and expand the Liquor Control Board of Ontario (LCBO). This article examines the reasons for the divergent policy choices made by Ralph Klein and Mike Harris' Conservative governments in each province. The article draws on John Kingdon's “multiple streams decision-making model,” to examine the mindsets of the key decision-makers, as well as “historical institutionalism,” to organize the pertinent structural, historical and institutional variables that shaped the milieu in which decision-makers acted. Unique, province-specific political cultures, histories, institutional configurations (including the relative influence of a number of powerful actors), as well as the fact that the two liquor control boards were on opposing trajectories towards their ultimate fates, help to explain the different decisions made by each government. Endogenous preference construction in this sector, furthermore, implies that each system is able to satisfy all relevant stakeholders, including consumers.

Publication types

  • Historical Article

MeSH terms

  • Alberta / ethnology
  • Alcohol Drinking / economics
  • Alcohol Drinking / ethnology
  • Alcohol Drinking / history
  • Alcoholic Beverages* / economics
  • Alcoholic Beverages* / history
  • Commerce* / economics
  • Commerce* / education
  • Commerce* / history
  • Commerce* / legislation & jurisprudence
  • Decision Making
  • History, 20th Century
  • History, 21st Century
  • Jurisprudence* / history
  • Local Government* / history
  • Marketing / economics
  • Marketing / education
  • Marketing / history
  • Marketing / legislation & jurisprudence
  • Ontario / ethnology
  • Public Health* / economics
  • Public Health* / education
  • Public Health* / history
  • Public Health* / legislation & jurisprudence
  • Social Control Policies / economics
  • Social Control Policies / history
  • Social Control Policies / legislation & jurisprudence