Translocation t(14;16) and multiple myeloma: is it really an independent prognostic factor?

Blood. 2011 Feb 10;117(6):2009-11. doi: 10.1182/blood-2010-07-295105. Epub 2010 Oct 20.

Abstract

Many trials in myeloma are stratified on cytogenetic abnormalities. Among them, the most commonly chosen are the t(4;14), the del(17p), and the t(14;16). If data are well established for t(4;14) and del(17p), very few data support the use of t(14;16). To address this issue, we retrospectively analyzed 1003 patients with newly diagnosed myeloma for this abnormality. We identified 32 patients with the t(14;16). Compared with patients lacking the t(14;16), we did not observe any difference in overall survival (P = .28). Moreover, in multivariate analyses, the t(14;16) was not prognostic (P = .39). In conclusion, our data do not support the use of t(14;16)-specific probes in the diagnostic panels of multiple myeloma.

Publication types

  • Clinical Trial
  • Randomized Controlled Trial

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Chromosomes, Human, Pair 14 / genetics*
  • Chromosomes, Human, Pair 16 / genetics*
  • Humans
  • Middle Aged
  • Multiple Myeloma / drug therapy
  • Multiple Myeloma / genetics*
  • Multivariate Analysis
  • Prognosis
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Survival Analysis
  • Translocation, Genetic*