Outcomes of patients with esophageal cancer staged with [¹⁸F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET): can postchemoradiotherapy FDG-PET predict the utility of resection?

J Clin Oncol. 2010 Nov 1;28(31):4714-21. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2010.30.7702. Epub 2010 Sep 27.

Abstract

Purpose: To determine whether [(18)F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) can delineate patients with esophageal cancer who may not benefit from esophagectomy after chemoradiotherapy.

Patients and methods: We reviewed records of 163 patients with histologically confirmed stage I to IVA esophageal cancer receiving chemoradiotherapy with or without resection with curative intent. All patients received surgical evaluation. Initial and postchemoradiotherapy FDG-PET scans and prognostic/treatment variables were analyzed. FDG-PET complete response (PET-CR) after chemoradiotherapy was defined as standardized uptake value ≤ 3.

Results: Eighty-eight patients received trimodality therapy and 75 received chemoradiotherapy. Surgery was deferred primarily due to medical inoperability or unresectable/metastatic disease after chemoradiotherapy. A total of 105 patients were evaluable for postchemoradiotherapy FDG-PET response. Thirty-one percent achieved a PET-CR. PET-CR predicted for improved outcomes for chemoradiotherapy (2-year overall survival, 71% v 11%, P < .01; 2-year freedom from local failure [LFF], 75% v 28%, P < .01), but not trimodality therapy. On multivariate analysis of patients treated with chemoradiotherapy, PET-CR is the strongest independent prognostic variable (survival hazard ratio [HR], 9.82, P < .01; LFF HR, 14.13, P < .01). PET-CR predicted for improved outcomes regardless of histology, although patients with adenocarcinoma achieved a PET-CR less often.

Conclusion: Patients treated with trimodality therapy found no benefit with PET-CR, likely because FDG-PET residual disease was resected. Definitive chemoradiotherapy patients achieving PET-CR had excellent outcomes equivalent to trimodality therapy despite poorer baseline characteristics. Patients who achieve a PET-CR may not benefit from added resection given their excellent outcomes without resection. These results should be validated in a prospective trial of FDG-PET-directed therapy for esophageal cancer.

Publication types

  • Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural

MeSH terms

  • Adenocarcinoma / diagnostic imaging
  • Adenocarcinoma / pathology
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols / therapeutic use*
  • Capecitabine
  • Chemotherapy, Adjuvant
  • Contrast Media
  • Deoxycytidine / administration & dosage
  • Deoxycytidine / analogs & derivatives
  • Esophageal Neoplasms / diagnostic imaging*
  • Esophageal Neoplasms / drug therapy
  • Esophageal Neoplasms / pathology*
  • Esophageal Neoplasms / radiotherapy
  • Esophageal Neoplasms / surgery
  • Esophagectomy*
  • Female
  • Fluorodeoxyglucose F18*
  • Fluorouracil / administration & dosage
  • Fluorouracil / analogs & derivatives
  • Humans
  • Kaplan-Meier Estimate
  • Male
  • Medical Records
  • Middle Aged
  • Multivariate Analysis
  • Neoplasm Staging
  • Paclitaxel / administration & dosage
  • Platinum Compounds / administration & dosage
  • Positron-Emission Tomography* / methods
  • Predictive Value of Tests
  • Radiopharmaceuticals
  • Radiotherapy Dosage
  • Radiotherapy, Adjuvant
  • Remission Induction
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Treatment Outcome

Substances

  • Contrast Media
  • Platinum Compounds
  • Radiopharmaceuticals
  • Deoxycytidine
  • Fluorodeoxyglucose F18
  • Capecitabine
  • Paclitaxel
  • Fluorouracil