Relevance of CONSORT reporting criteria for research on eHealth interventions

Patient Educ Couns. 2010 Dec:81 Suppl:S77-86. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2010.07.040. Epub 2010 Sep 16.

Abstract

Objective: In 1996, 2001, and 2010, the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) group released criteria for reporting critical information about randomized clinical trials [1,2]. These criteria were intended to improve the quality and completeness of reporting of RCTs in health care research. This paper discusses the relevance of the CONSORT recommendations for the reporting and design of eHealth research.

Methods: We reviewed the CONSORT recommendations and discussed their particular relevance to eHealth (electronic information, support and/or communication resources designed to promote health) research. This review focuses on such issues as recruitment and screening of participants, description of treatment elements, and reporting of outcome data and adverse events.

Results: eHealth research presents special challenges regarding the comprehensive and effective reporting of research information. However, the strategic application of CONSORT recommendations holds great promise for improving the quality and informativeness of eHealth research.

Conclusion: Investigators need to consider CONSORT recommendations at all stages of the research enterprise, including planning, execution and reporting in order to increase the informativeness of their research efforts.

Practice implications: The recommendations contained in this paper have the potential to enhance the public health and scientific value of eHealth research.

Publication types

  • Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Electronic Data Processing
  • Guidelines as Topic / standards*
  • Health Services Research / methods
  • Health Services Research / standards
  • Humans
  • Publishing / standards*
  • Quality Control
  • Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic / standards*
  • Research Design / standards