Parenteral nutrition: a clear and present danger unabated by tight glucose control

Am J Surg. 2010 Sep;200(3):386-90. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2009.10.023.

Abstract

Background: The infectious risks of parenteral nutrition (PN) in critical illness are well described, although most literature predates tight glucose control (TGC) practice. The authors hypothesized that PN-related complications are ameliorated by TGC and are equivalent to those in enteral nutrition (EN) patients.

Methods: A prospective cohort study of patients admitted to the surgical intensive care unit was conducted, comparing PN and EN patients. TGC target was 80 to 110 mg/dL. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression was used to explore the association between infectious outcomes and PN use.

Results: One hundred fifty-five patients were studied. Mean daily glucose values were lower for the PN group than for the EN patients (118.2 vs 125.6 mg/dL, P = .002). Nonetheless, the incidence of bloodstream infection and catheter-related bloodstream infection was significantly associated with the administration of PN. In a multivariate logistic regression model, PN was associated with a >4-fold increase in the odds of having a catheter-related bloodstream infection (odds ratio, 4.48; 95% confidence interval, 1.14-17.49; P = .03).

Conclusions: Despite the successful implementation of TGC, PN is still a significant risk factor for infectious complications among surgical intensive care unit patients.

MeSH terms

  • Bacteremia / etiology*
  • Blood Glucose / metabolism*
  • Catheters, Indwelling / adverse effects*
  • Critical Illness*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Intensive Care Units
  • Logistic Models
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Parenteral Nutrition / adverse effects*
  • Prospective Studies

Substances

  • Blood Glucose