Choosing the nephrostomy size after percutaneous nephrolithotomy

World J Urol. 2011 Dec;29(6):707-11. doi: 10.1007/s00345-010-0587-6. Epub 2010 Aug 27.

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the effect of nephrostomy tube size on perioperative outcomes of percutaneous nephrolithtotmy (PCNL).

Methods: Forty-five well-matched patients with normal renal function were prospectively divided in two nonrandomized groups after uneventful PCNL (to receive either a 22-Fr, group 1 (n = 24 pts), or a 12-Fr nephrostomy tube, group 2 (n = 21 pts)). In all a balloon nephrostomy catheter with detachable funnel (Rüsch Teleflex, Germany) was used. A Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for measuring the pain was administered 8 and 24 h after the procedure. Postoperative analgesics use (Ketoralac Tromethamine 30 mg), pre- and postoperative Hb, renal function and urinary leaks were registered.

Results: Groups were comparable as demographics and stone characteristics. VAS pain score was significantly higher in group 1 (4.25 vs. 3.2, P < 0.001) only 8 h postoperatively. No significant difference was found in the VAS pain score 24 h p.o. Similarly, analgesics use (1.6 vs. 1.1, P = 0.05), sHb (1.42 vs. 1.21, P = 0.055) and hospital stay (3.8 vs. 3.6, P = 0.63) were not significant between the two groups of patients.

Conclusions: A small bore nephrostomy catheter may reduce pain in the immediate postoperative time. It does not affect blood loss and hospital stay so it can safely be used instead of a large size nephrostomy tube, after uneventful percutaneous procedures.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Blood Loss, Surgical
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Kidney Calculi / surgery*
  • Length of Stay
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Nephrostomy, Percutaneous / instrumentation*
  • Nephrostomy, Percutaneous / methods*
  • Pain Measurement
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Treatment Outcome