Open and closed inflorescences: more than simple opposites

J Exp Bot. 2011 Jan;62(1):79-88. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erq262. Epub 2010 Aug 25.

Abstract

The absence of a terminal flower in inflorescences ('open inflorescences') is currently explained by the maintenance of putative stem-cells in the central zone (CZ) of the inflorescence meristem (IM) governed by the CLAVATA-WUSCHEL regulatory loop. Disruption of this regulatory pathway, as in Arabidopsis TERMINAL FLOWER LOCUS 1 mutants, leads to terminal flower production. However, recent studies in other taxa reveal novel mechanisms of inflorescence termination; for example, the SEPALLATA-like MADS-box floral identity gene GERBERA REGULATOR OF CAPITULUM DEVELOPMENT 2 in Gerbera excludes the retention of a CZ as an ontogenetic cause for the openness of these inflorescences. Moreover, comparative histological studies show that the retention of a CZ in the IM, mostly a feature of the 'typical open families', is absent in open inflorescences of other families. Concerning these groups, new evidence suggests that spatial constraints at the IM could play a role at the time when terminal flower production (or not) is determined. This indicates that the multiple loss and re-gain of the terminal flower in angiosperms is necessarily based on more than one ontogenetic pathway.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Gene Expression Regulation, Developmental
  • Gene Expression Regulation, Plant*
  • Inflorescence / genetics
  • Inflorescence / growth & development
  • Inflorescence / physiology*
  • Plant Development
  • Plant Physiological Phenomena
  • Plant Proteins / genetics
  • Plant Proteins / metabolism
  • Plants / genetics

Substances

  • Plant Proteins