Histomorphometric analysis and removal torque of small diameter implants with alternative surface treatments and different designs

J Oral Implantol. 2010;36(4):263-72. doi: 10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-09-00052.

Abstract

This study was designed to investigate the histomorphometric and biomechanical comparison of small-diameter implants with different designs. These implants can be placed surgically in narrow bone spaces, such as the lower incisor region, that have low occlusal loading. Specimens of screw-shaped pin implants were designed for the study. These specimen implants were divided into 6 groups: group 1, machined implants; group 2, resorbable blast media (RBM)-treated implants; group 3, machined implants with a long vertical groove; group 4, RBM-treated implants with a long vertical groove; group 5, RBM-treated implants with a vertical groove on the upper thread; and group 6, RBM-treated implants with a vertical groove on the lower trunk. The specimen implants were placed surgically on the medial side of the rabbit tibia. Animals were sacrificed 2, 4, and 8 weeks after surgery. The removal torque was measured and tissues were prepared for histologic and histomorphometric analysis. The bone-to-implant contact and the percentage of the bone area inside the threads were measured. RBM-treated implants with vertical groove groups showed significantly higher values of removal torque, bone-implant contact, and bone area rate than the ones of machined surface groups.

MeSH terms

  • Animals
  • Coated Materials, Biocompatible
  • Dental Implantation, Endosseous
  • Dental Implants*
  • Dental Prosthesis Design*
  • Device Removal*
  • Implants, Experimental
  • Male
  • Miniaturization
  • Osseointegration
  • Rabbits
  • Surface Properties
  • Tibia / surgery
  • Torque

Substances

  • Coated Materials, Biocompatible
  • Dental Implants