[Comparison among three standards of TW2 to skeletal age determination in children with central precocious puberty]

Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2010 Jun;26(3):181-4.
[Article in Chinese]

Abstract

Objective: To discuss the diagnostic value of English, Chinese and Japanese standards of TW2 to skeletal age assessment of children with central precocious puberty (CPP), then to confirm the normal thresholds.

Methods: Sixty one children as patient group were definitely assured CPP. The control group had 67 children. Among them, 61 were normal children, another 6 children as a special control group. Left hand-wrist X-ray radiographs were retrospectively analyzed by two doctors separately and their skeletal ages were assessed with the three standards of TW2 method. The differences between skeletal age and chronological age were analyzed with ROC in SPSS 13.0.

Results: (1) The skeletal age results showed kappa value is 0.776 deduced by two clinical doctors(u = 16.128, P < 0.05). (2) There were no statistic differences for the areas under ROC curves among three methods. (3) d > or = 1.15 years in TW2, d > or = 1.25 years in TW2-CHN and d > or = 0.65 years in TW2-JP were more susceptive and specific points.

Conclusion: TW2, TW2-CHN and TW2-JP provided a higher value for the diagnosis of skeletal age in unhealthy children, and TW2-CHN is highest value for Chinese children.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Age Determination by Skeleton / methods*
  • Age Determination by Skeleton / standards
  • Age Factors
  • Body Height
  • Bone Development
  • Carpal Bones / diagnostic imaging*
  • Carpal Bones / growth & development
  • Child
  • Child, Preschool
  • China
  • Female
  • Hand / diagnostic imaging
  • Hand / growth & development
  • Humans
  • Infant
  • Male
  • Puberty, Precocious / diagnosis*
  • ROC Curve
  • Sensitivity and Specificity