Comparison of guideline recommendations with daily practice in patients with renal cell carcinoma

Eur J Med Res. 2010 Jun 28;15(6):253-7. doi: 10.1186/2047-783x-15-6-253.

Abstract

Objectives and aims: To compare guideline recommendations with daily practice patterns in a German patient cohort with renal cell carcinoma.

Patients and methods: 81 patients with T1 oder T2 renal cell carcinoma (RCC) were included in this prospective single-center study. All patients were operated in a single institution either by open radical nephrectomy (ORN) or nephron sparing surgery (NSS). Patients and doctors were evaluated using a written questionnaire with a follow-up of 12 months. Follow-up intervals, follow-up modalities (e. g. imaging modalities, laboratory controls of blood and urine) and the call on psycho-oncological support were evaluated.

Results: The majority of patients (72%) were followed up by their urologists. Follow-up examinations included abdominal ultrasound, urine and blood diagnostics, conventional chest x-rays, computed tomography (CT) of abdomen, chest or head or abdominal Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI). There were no significant differences between patients operated by ORN or NSS. In total, 12.5% of patients were asking for psycho-oncological support.

Conclusions: In general, patients were followed up according to existing guideline recommendations. Only a small proportion of patients asked for psycho-oncological treatment.

MeSH terms

  • Carcinoma, Renal Cell / pathology
  • Carcinoma, Renal Cell / psychology
  • Carcinoma, Renal Cell / surgery*
  • Female
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Health Status
  • Humans
  • Kidney Neoplasms / pathology
  • Kidney Neoplasms / psychology
  • Kidney Neoplasms / surgery*
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Nephrectomy / methods*
  • Nephrectomy / psychology
  • Practice Guidelines as Topic*
  • Prospective Studies
  • Social Support
  • Surveys and Questionnaires
  • Treatment Outcome