Stable angina pectoris: what does the current clinical evidence tell us?

J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2010 Jul;110(7):364-70.

Abstract

Coronary artery disease is the leading cause of death in the United States. The combination of noninvasive cardiovascular testing and invasive cardiac procedures accounts for a substantial portion of the yearly healthcare expenditure in the United States. Although the diagnosis of ischemically-driven chest pain may appear to be simple and straightforward, it often takes an astute clinician to confirm that clinically significant coronary artery blockage is the cause of a patient's chest pain. Cardiovascular research has provided convincing evidence that aggressive treatment of hypertension and hyperlipidemia--along with a management plan, based on the patient's combined risk factor profile, that includes blood glucose assessment, tobacco cessation, weight loss, healthy eating choices, and consistent aerobic exercise--must be provided to achieve optimal care for our patients. Over the ensuing decade, we will likely continue to see a shift away from routine percutaneous treatment of coronary lesions in favor of an aggressive assessment of a patient's cardiac risk profile followed by a treatment plan centered on active patient involvement including appropriate lifestyle changes and selective medications.

Publication types

  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Angina Pectoris / diagnosis*
  • Angina Pectoris / drug therapy
  • Angina Pectoris / pathology
  • Angina Pectoris / therapy
  • Anticholesteremic Agents / therapeutic use
  • Chest Pain / diagnosis
  • Chest Pain / pathology
  • Cholesterol, LDL / drug effects
  • Diagnosis, Differential
  • Disease Progression
  • Exercise Test
  • Exercise Therapy
  • Humans
  • Hypercholesterolemia / drug therapy
  • Hypercholesterolemia / pathology
  • Hypertension / drug therapy
  • Hypertension / pathology
  • Life Style
  • Metabolic Syndrome
  • Risk Factors
  • Smoking Cessation

Substances

  • Anticholesteremic Agents
  • Cholesterol, LDL