Transvaginal repair of genital prolapse with polypropylene mesh using a tension-free technique

Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2010 Nov;153(1):104-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2010.07.011. Epub 2010 Jul 31.

Abstract

Objectives: To assess the perioperative complications and short-term outcomes of prolapse repair using transvaginal polypropylene mesh.

Study design: Retrospective study. In the period from April 2007 to September 2009, 67 women underwent vaginal repair with implantation of a soft mesh manufactured by Gynecare.

Results: All the patients had a stage 3 or stage 4 prolapse. Total mesh was used in eight patients (11.9%), isolated anterior mesh in 36 patients (53.7%) and isolated posterior mesh in 23 patients (34.4%). We reported one intraoperative bladder injury and no other serious complications. At 3 months, all the 67 patients were available for follow-up. Vaginal erosion occurred in eight patients (11.9%), shrinkage of mesh in six patients (8.7%), granuloma without exposure in four patients (5.9%), de novo urinary incontinence in three patients (4.5%) and flatus incontinence in one patient (1.5%). Failure rate was 7.5% (recurrent prolapse stage 3 or 4, even asymptomatic).

Conclusion: Our study suggests that transvaginal polypropylene mesh applied with a tension-free technique is a safe and effective method with low intraoperative complications but with considerable potential postoperative morbidity.

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Dyspareunia / etiology
  • Female
  • Gynecologic Surgical Procedures / adverse effects
  • Gynecologic Surgical Procedures / methods*
  • Humans
  • Middle Aged
  • Polypropylenes
  • Postoperative Complications / etiology
  • Surgical Mesh*
  • Uterine Prolapse / surgery*
  • Vagina

Substances

  • Polypropylenes