Effects of head-up tilt-table test on the QT interval

Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2010 Jul;15(3):245-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1542-474X.2010.00371.x.

Abstract

Background: The QT interval shortens in response to sympathetic stimulation and its response to epinephrine infusion (in healthy individuals and patients with long QT syndrome) has been thoroughly studied. Head-up tilt-table (HUT) testing is an easy way to achieve brisk sympathetic stimulation. Yet, little is known about the response of the QT interval to HUT.

Methods: We reviewed the electrocardiograms of HUT tests performed at our institution and compare the heart rate, QT, and QTc obtained immediately after HUT with the rest values.

Results: The study group consisted of 41 patients (27 females and 14 males) aged 23.9 +/- 8.4 years. Head-up tilting led to a significant shortening of the RR interval (from 825 +/- 128 msec at rest phase to 712 +/- 130 msec in the upward tilt phase, P < 0.001) but only to a moderate shortening of the QT interval (from 363.7 +/- 27.9 msec during rest to 355 +/- 30.3 msec during upward tilt, P = 0.001). Since the RR interval shortened more than the QT interval, the QTc actually increased (from 403 +/- 21.5 msec during rest phase to 423.2 +/- 27.4 msec during upward tilt, P < 0.001). The QTc value measured for the upward tilt position was longer than the resting QTc value in 33 of 41 patients. Of those, 4 male patients and 2 female patients developed upward-tilt QTc values above what would be considered abnormal at rest.

Conclusions: During HUT the QT shortens less than the RR interval. Consequently, the QTc increases during head-up tilt.

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Cohort Studies
  • Electrocardiography / methods
  • Female
  • Heart Rate*
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Syncope, Vasovagal / physiopathology*
  • Tilt-Table Test / methods*
  • Young Adult