Effect of conical configuration of fixture on the maintenance of marginal bone level: preliminary results at 1 year of function

Clin Oral Implants Res. 2010 Apr 1;21(4):439-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01871.x.

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate and to compare the effect of the conical neck design on marginal bone loss around the fixtures, when both implants were provided with micro-threads to the top of the fixture.

Materials and methods: Two types of implant, one with a straight shape (S) and the other with a conical neck design (C) provided with a retentive element to the top of the fixture, were placed adjacent to each other in the partially edentulous areas of 12 patients. Bone loss around each implant was analyzed after 1 year of functional loading. The bone losses after loading were compared using Wilcoxon's signed-rank test.

Results: The mean marginal bone losses (S, 0.05 + or - 0.09 mm; C, 0.07 + or - 0.14 mm) were not statistically significant between the two groups (P=0.578).

Conclusions: There was no significant difference between conical and straight neck implants in terms of marginal bone loss after 1 year of loading.

Publication types

  • Randomized Controlled Trial
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Alveolar Bone Loss / prevention & control*
  • Dental Implantation, Endosseous*
  • Dental Implants*
  • Dental Prosthesis Design*
  • Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Prospective Studies
  • Statistics, Nonparametric

Substances

  • Dental Implants