[Efficacy evaluation of anal intersphincteric resection with direct coloanal anastomosis for T1-2 ultra-low rectal cancer]

Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2010 Apr;13(4):256-9.
[Article in Chinese]

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the oncological and functional outcomes of intersphincteric resection (ISR) in T(1-2) ultra-low rectal cancer.

Methods: From March 2000 to March 2007, ISR with total mesorectal excision (TME) was performed in 40 patients with very low rectal cancer,among whom total ISR in 5 patients, partial ISR in 23 patients, and partial ISR with partial dentate line preservation (modified partial ISR) in 12 patients. The preoperative tumor staging was T(1-2)N(0-1)M(0).

Results: Morbidity was identified in 3 patients including anastomotic leakage in 1 patient and wound infection in 2 patients, and there was no postoperative mortality. The 5-year overall survival rate was 97%, and 5-year disease-free survival rate was 86%. Both patients with modified partial ISR (P=0.004) and patients with partial ISR (P=0.008) had significantly better continence than those with total ISR, and patients with a diverting stoma had significantly better continence (P=0.043) than those without a stoma at 12 months after surgery.

Conclusions: ISR is a safe procedure for sphincter-saving rectal surgery in selected patients with very low rectal tumors. A temporary diverting stoma may be beneficial to the improvement of anal function. Modified partial ISR under the precondition of radical resection shows better anal function and lower rate of incontinence.

Publication types

  • Evaluation Study
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Anal Canal / surgery*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Neoplasm Staging
  • Rectal Neoplasms / pathology
  • Rectal Neoplasms / surgery*
  • Treatment Outcome