Chronic human exposure to formaldehyde is significantly increased by indoor sources. However, information is lacking on why these exposures appear to persist in older homes with aging sources. We use data from the Relationships of Indoor, Outdoor, and Personal Air study to evaluate 179 residences, most of which were older than 5 years. We assess the dependence of indoor formaldehyde concentrations (C(in)) on building type and age, whole-house air exchange rate, indoor temperature, and seasonal changes. Indoor formaldehyde had mean and median concentrations of 17 ppb, and primarily originated from indoor sources. The factors we analyzed did not explain much of the variance in C(in), probably because of their limited influence on mechanisms that control the long-term release of formaldehyde from aging pressed-wood products bound with urea-formaldehyde (UF) resins. We confirmed that the mitigating effects of ventilation on C(in) decrease with time through the analysis of data for new homes available in the literature, and through models. We also explored source control strategies and conclude that source removal is the most effective way to decrease chronic exposures to formaldehyde in existing homes. For new homes, reducing indoor sources and using pressed-wood with lower UF content are likely the best solutions.
Practical implications: Formaldehyde concentrations in homes due to indoor sources appear to persist throughout the lifetime of residences. Increases in ventilation rates are most effective in decreasing indoor concentrations in new homes where formaldehyde levels are high or when homes are tight. Consequently, other alternatives need to be promoted such as decreasing the amount of pressed-wood products with urea-formaldehyde (UF) resins in homes or reducing the UF content in these materials.