Evaluation of the flow rate of 3 endodontic sealers: Sealer 26, AH Plus, and MTA Obtura

Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2010 Jan;109(1):e47-9. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2009.08.038.

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the flow rate of 3 endodontic sealers: Sealer 26, AH Plus, and MTA Obtura.

Study design: According to the method proposed by the American Dental Association (ADA specification no. 57), the sealers were placed between 2 glass slabs under a weight of 120 g. The diameters of the formed discs were measured with a digital paquimeter. The test was repeated 5 times for each sealer.

Results: The results were expressed as arithmetic means, and the statistical analysis was performed through Turkey test. AH Plus showed significantly superior flow rate compared with Sealer 26 and MTA Obtura. There was no statistically significant difference between flow rates presented by Sealer 26 and MTA Obtura.

Conclusion: Within the limitations of this in vitro study, it was concluded that all of the the endodontic sealers tested presented greater flow than the minimum recommended in the ADA 57 specification.

Publication types

  • Evaluation Study

MeSH terms

  • Aluminum Compounds / chemistry
  • Bismuth / chemistry
  • Calcium Compounds / chemistry
  • Calcium Hydroxide / chemistry
  • Drug Combinations
  • Epoxy Resins / chemistry
  • Materials Testing
  • Oxides / chemistry
  • Rheology
  • Root Canal Filling Materials / chemistry*
  • Silicates / chemistry
  • Statistics, Nonparametric
  • Viscosity

Substances

  • Aluminum Compounds
  • Calcium Compounds
  • Drug Combinations
  • Epoxy Resins
  • Oxides
  • Root Canal Filling Materials
  • Sealer 26
  • Silicates
  • epoxy resin-based root canal sealer
  • mineral trioxide aggregate
  • Calcium Hydroxide
  • Bismuth