Neutral and acidic oligosaccharides in preterm infants: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

Am J Clin Nutr. 2010 Mar;91(3):679-86. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.2009.28625. Epub 2009 Dec 23.

Abstract

Background: Serious infectious morbidity is high in preterm infants. Enteral supplementation of prebiotics may reduce the incidence of serious infections, especially infections related to the gastrointestinal tract.

Objective: The objective was to determine the effect of enteral supplementation of a prebiotic mixture consisting of neutral oligosaccharides ((SC)GOS/(LC)FOS) and acidic oligosaccharides (AOS) on serious infectious morbidity in preterm infants.

Design: In a randomized controlled trial, preterm infants (gestational age <32 wk and/or birth weight <1500 g) received enteral supplementation of 80% (SC)GOS/(LC)FOS and 20% AOS (1.5 g . kg(-1) . d(-1)) or placebo (maltodextrin) between days 3 and 30 of life. Serious infectious morbidity was defined as a culture positive for sepsis, meningitis, pyelonephritis, or pneumonia. The analysis was performed by intention-to-treat and per-protocol, defined as > or =50% supplementation dose during the study period.

Results: In total, 113 preterm infants were included. Baseline and nutritional characteristics were not different between groups. In the intention-to-treat analysis, the incidence of > or =1 serious infection, > or =1 serious endogenous infection, or > or =2 serious infectious episodes was not significantly different in the (SC)GOS/(LC)FOS/AOS-supplemented and placebo groups. In the per-protocol analysis, there was a trend toward a lower incidence of > or =1 serious endogenous infection and > or =2 serious infectious episodes in the (SC)GOS/(LC)FOS/AOS-supplemented group than in the placebo group (P = 0.09 and P = 0.07, respectively).

Conclusions: Enteral supplementation of (SC)GOS/(LC)FOS/AOS does not significantly reduce the risk of serious infectious morbidity in preterm infants. However, there was a trend toward a lower incidence of serious infectious morbidity, especially for infections with endogenous bacteria. This finding suggests a possible beneficial effect that should be evaluated in a larger study. This trial was registered at isrctn.org as ISRCTN16211826.

Publication types

  • Randomized Controlled Trial
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Acids
  • Anti-Infective Agents / therapeutic use*
  • Communicable Diseases / epidemiology*
  • Cross Infection / epidemiology
  • Cross Infection / prevention & control*
  • Dietary Supplements
  • Double-Blind Method
  • Enteral Nutrition / methods
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Incidence
  • Infant, Newborn
  • Infant, Premature, Diseases / microbiology
  • Infant, Premature, Diseases / prevention & control*
  • Intention to Treat Analysis
  • Male
  • Meningitis / epidemiology
  • Meningitis / prevention & control
  • Oligosaccharides / therapeutic use*
  • Pneumonia / epidemiology
  • Pneumonia / prevention & control
  • Prebiotics*
  • Pyelonephritis / epidemiology
  • Pyelonephritis / prevention & control
  • Risk
  • Sepsis / epidemiology
  • Sepsis / prevention & control

Substances

  • Acids
  • Anti-Infective Agents
  • Oligosaccharides
  • Prebiotics

Associated data

  • ISRCTN/ISRCTN16211826