Mechanical properties of new self-adhesive resin-based cement

J Prosthodont Res. 2010 Apr;54(2):59-64. doi: 10.1016/j.jpor.2009.09.004. Epub 2009 Oct 30.

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study was to compare the bonding strength, flexural strength, elastic modulus, water absorption and the expansion after water storage of new self-adhesive resin cements to commercially available dental cements.

Methods: Two types (hand-mix and auto-mix) of new self-adhesive resin cements (SAC-H and SAC-A, Kuraray Medical), one conventional resin cement (Panavia F2.0), three self-adhesive resin cements (Relyx Unicem, Maxcem and G-Cem), and two resin-modified glass-ionomer cements (Fuji Luting S and Vitremer) were used. Shear bond strengths, flexural strengths and elastic moduli (ISO 4049), water absorption (ISO 4049), and the expansion rate after water storage were investigated.

Results: Both SAC-H and SAC-A provided adhesion to enamel and dentin, and had the same bond strength to gold alloy and zirconia as conventional resin cements. SAC-H and SAC-A had greater flexural strengths (86.4-93.5MPa) than commercial self-adhesive resin cements or glass-ionomer cements. The elastic moduli of self-adhesive and glass-ionomer cements were 5.2-7.4GPa and 2.3-3.4GPa, respectively. The water absorption of SAC-H and SAC-A (26.3-27.7microg/mm(3)) were significantly lower than commercial self-adhesive resin cements. SAC-H and SAC-A showed significantly lower expansion rates (0.17-0.26%) than commercial self-adhesive cements and glass-ionomer cements after 4 weeks water storage.

Conclusions: It is suggested that the new self-adhesive resin cements exhibited a favorable bonding capability and mechanical properties.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Materials Testing
  • Resin Cements*

Substances

  • Resin Cements
  • Adhesive cement