Decompression of the ulnar nerve and minimal medial epicondylectomy with a small incision for cubital tunnel syndrome: comparison with anterior subcutaneous transposition of the nerve

J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2010 Jul;63(7):1150-5. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2009.09.018. Epub 2009 Oct 28.

Abstract

The objective of this study is to compare the results of ulnar nerve decompression and minimal medial epicondylectomy with a small incision (group I) and anterior subcutaneous transposition of the ulnar nerve (group II) for cubital tunnel syndrome.

Methods: Out of 56 patients with cubital tunnel syndrome, 29 were in group I and 27 were in group II. The mean age at the time of the operation was 48.9 years, and the mean follow-up period was 36.4 months. Preoperatively, the neuropathy was graded according to Dellon's criteria.

Results: There were no significant differences between the results of the two groups according to the modified Bishop's system at the last follow-up. However, four patients showed painful neuroma around the operation scar and one patient in group II had experienced acute deterioration of the symptoms after the procedure.

Conclusions: Decompression and minimal medial epicondylectomy with a small incision seems to be more recommendable than anterior subcutaneous transposition of the ulnar nerve for cubital tunnel syndrome in terms of its simplicity and lesser invasiveness.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Cubital Tunnel Syndrome / surgery*
  • Decompression, Surgical / adverse effects
  • Decompression, Surgical / methods*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Humerus / surgery*
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Nerve Transfer*
  • Ulnar Nerve / surgery*
  • Young Adult