Atypical appendicitis: diagnostic value of volume-rendered reconstructions obtained with 16-slice multidetector-row CT

Radiol Med. 2010 Feb;115(1):93-104. doi: 10.1007/s11547-009-0450-2. Epub 2009 Sep 22.
[Article in English, Italian]

Abstract

Purpose: This study was done to assess the possible clinical value of volume-rendered (VR) and curved volume-rendered (cVR) reconstructions obtained from isotropic data in the diagnosis of atypical appendicitis.

Materials and methods: Forty-five patients with suspected acute appendicitis were examined with 16-slice multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) before and after contrast material injection. A diagnosis of atypical appendicitis was made in 33 cases. Two independent blinded radiologists with 2 and 9 years of CT experience assessed the axial scans and 2 months later the VR and cVR reconstructions. The following parameters were considered: presence, location, and wall thickness of the appendix; wall enhancement; distension; periappendiceal fat attenuation; presence of appendicolith; and free air and/or periappendiceal fluid collections. Sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy values were calculated for each reader. The concordance between the two radiologists was analysed by using Cohen's kappa statistic.

Results: Mean sensitivity, specificity and accuracy for the less experienced radiologist were, respectively, 82%, 91% and 84% for the axial scans and 94%, 91% and 93% for the VR and cVR images, whereas the values for the more experienced reader were 94%, 100% and 95% for axial scans, and 97%, 100% and 98% for VR and cVR images.

Conclusions: In patients with atypical appendicitis, VR and cVR reconstructions increase the accuracy of MDCT in relation to the reader's experience and reduce the number of false negative results.

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Appendicitis / diagnostic imaging*
  • Contrast Media
  • Diagnosis, Differential
  • Diagnostic Errors / prevention & control
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Predictive Value of Tests
  • Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted*
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Sensitivity and Specificity
  • Tomography, X-Ray Computed*

Substances

  • Contrast Media