A distal fluted, proximal modular femoral prosthesis in revision hip arthroplasty

J Arthroplasty. 2010 Sep;25(6):932-8. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2009.06.031. Epub 2009 Sep 16.

Abstract

Most reports on the use of modular femoral stems during revision surgery have involved short follow-up periods. The authors evaluated the clinical and radiographic performance of 59 patients fitted with a distal fix modular stem. The average follow-up period was 8.2 years. Average Harris hip score was improved from 47 to 87.6. Of 19 patients with trochanteric osteotomy, 4 had a displaced greater trochanter. Re-revision was performed in 5 patients, and 3 of these were for subsidence (of these 3, subsidence was associated with dissociation of the coupling part in 1 and with osteotomy nonunion in other 2 [proximal component only]). Modular distally fixed femoral stems were found to offer intraoperative flexibility, but to suffer from subsidence and intraoperative greater trochanter and metaphyseal femoral fractures.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip*
  • Female
  • Femur / diagnostic imaging
  • Hip Prosthesis* / adverse effects
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Osteolysis / diagnostic imaging
  • Osteolysis / etiology
  • Periprosthetic Fractures / surgery
  • Prosthesis Design*
  • Prosthesis Failure
  • Radiography
  • Reoperation